HomeIcon Rounded Arrow White - BRIX TemplatesArticlesIcon Rounded Arrow White - BRIX TemplatesOil curse, economic growth and trade openness

Oil curse, economic growth and trade openness

This article delves into the academic paper "Oil curse, economic growth and trade openness" by Majumder, M.K., Raghavan, M., and Vespignani, J. (2020). We analytically discuss the paper's methodology, significant findings, and how these implications affect economies worldwide, resulting in a thorough examination of its implications for both the academic field and policymakers.

Introduction

Majumder, Raghavan, and Vespignani (2020) embarked on an investigative journey on the oil curse, economic growth, and the role of trade openness in the global economic framework. This paper examines the methodology utilized by the researchers, their findings, insights and sheds extra light on areas that merit further exploration.

Methodology

Majumder, Raghavan, and Vespignani (2020) have used a cross country panel data approach with various econometric models, including the Fixed Effect Model and the Two-stage least squares regression model. The study also makes extensive use of interaction terms to explore the ramifications of trade openness on the relation between oil revenues and economic growth (Majumder, Raghavan, and Vespignani, 2020).

Findings

The paper put forth the notion that more prominent oil revenue could indeed have a negative impact on economic growth, thus hinting at the existence of an 'oil curse.' However, this relationship isn't universally applicable and has varied nation-specific context. One key factor discovered was the role of trade openness, which could potentially offset the negative impacts of larger oil revenues (Majumder, Raghavan, and Vespignani, 2020).

Implications and Discussion

The findings from Majumder, Raghavan, and Vespignani's (2020) work hold substantial implications for both theory-building and policy-making. The country-specific factors imply a need to diverge from a 'one-size-fits-all' approach in oil revenue management and underline the importance of trade openness, as it seems to serve as a mitigator of the 'oil curse' on economic growth.

Future Research Areas

While the paper provides crucial insights, it opens up other potential research avenues. It calls for further investigation into other mitigating factors besides trade openness, country-specific strategies to manage oil revenues effectively, as well as exploratory work on non-oil commodities and their interplay with economic growth.

Conclusion

Majumder, Raghavan, and Vespignani's (2020) paper presents an intriguingly complex dynamic between oil curse, economic growth, and trade openness. This article aims to broaden the understanding of this intricate relationship and highlight further research possibilities born from this foundational study.

References

Majumder, M.K., Raghavan, M. and Vespignani, J., 2020. Oil curse, economic growth and trade openness. Energy Economics, 91, p.104896.

Stay updated with our newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to stay up to date and receive our updated forecasts with an in-depth analysis every month.